🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."